Every web project starts with planning, and choosing the proper project management methodology is one of the first choices you must make!
This choice will inform your project’s course, budget, and timeline, so making the right one is essential!
In today’s article, we’ll look at the two of the most popular project methodologies – Agile and Waterfall – and discuss when you should pick one over another.
Let’s dig in!
With Agile, it’s all in the name. This methodology is all about flexibility and collaboration. Because digital trends are sporadic and stakeholders’ desires can sometimes be mercurial, Agile has become a go-to choice for web development projects.
These principles are at the core of Agile as a methodology that doesn’t try to work against how humans interact but instead goes with the flow.
There are several reasons why Agile is a great fit for web development projects:
While Agile has many benefits, it’s not absolute but situational. Specific projects call for a different approach due to the Agile’s drawbacks, which include:
Despite these drawbacks, Agile remains a popular and practical choice for many web development projects.
So now we know that Agile is great for one thing but not the others. Well, when do you WANT To use Agile?
Let’s look at some of the more famous examples.
Agile is an excellent choice if you’re working on a project where the requirements will likely change or evolve. With its focus on flexibility and adaptability, Agile allows teams to adjust their plans as needed based on feedback and new information.
Agile is a natural fit if your project involves a lot of experimentation and iteration. By delivering working software in short sprints, Agile teams can quickly test ideas and get feedback from stakeholders, leading to better results in less time.
Agile emphasizes close collaboration between developers and clients. If your project requires frequent feedback and input from stakeholders, Agile provides a framework for regular communication and collaboration.
Any web developer will tell you that “tight deadlines” and “market pressure” might as well be synonymous with the profession. Hence, Agile is well-suited for many of these projects, allowing teams to deliver working software quickly and incrementally.
Agile is likely to be a good choice if your web development project fits any of these criteria. The flexibility and rapid iteration it offers allow teams to deliver high-quality products on time AND a budget.
Now that we have touched on the popular kid on the block, let’s look at the one who’s slightly forgotten and sometimes shunned – Waterfall.💧
But I’m here to tell you that just because it’s not as popular doesn’t mean it isn’t cool!
Waterfall’s main idea is that projects should move through well-defined phases, each building on the previous phase’s work. The typical phases in a Waterfall project include:
Each phase must be FULLY completed before moving on to the next, and there is little room for going back and making changes once a phase is complete.
Well, why would anyone want to pick that over Agile, where you can do whatever you want (just kidding)? I digress, but despite its rigid structure, Waterfall has some advantages for web development projects:
But as you may have figured by now, waterfall methodology also has some glaring disadvantages, among which:
It seems that Agile should always be THE choice, given that web projects are rarely rigid and immovable, principles that seemingly betray their foundation, right?
Well … yes, but also no?
Our domain is full of projects that require specification adherence, which frequently trumps the reactivity offered by Agile.
Waterfall can be a good choice if you have a clear, detailed understanding of the project requirements from the outset, which will likely stay the same. With its emphasis on comprehensive planning and documentation, Waterfall is well-suited for projects with stable, well-defined requirements.
In some cases, such as projects with multiple stakeholders or complex regulatory requirements, extensive planning and documentation may be necessary.
Waterfall’s structured approach can benefit large, complex projects with many moving parts and dependencies. By completing each phase before moving on to the next, Waterfall can help ensure that all the necessary pieces are in place before proceeding, reducing the risk of delays or issues down the line.
Waterfall’s emphasis on documentation and linear progression can be a good fit in industries with strict regulatory or compliance requirements (e.g., healthcare or finance). The straightforward, step-by-step approach can help ensure that all necessary regulations and standards are met at each project stage.
So there are circumstances when waterfall provides peace of mind and security that is simply not there in Agile. Nonetheless, waterfall is quite a committal approach to project management, so be 100% sure that it’s something you need before going forward.
Or consider an alternative that’s kind of the best of both worlds?
While Agile and Waterfall are often presented as opposing methodologies, many organizations (sometimes, unknowingly, even) use a hybrid approach that combines elements of both.
So, why would one even go that route, or how? This arrangement can take many forms, but it often involves using Agile practices within the Waterfall structure. For example, a project may begin with a Waterfall-style planning phase, followed by several Agile sprints for development and testing.
The benefits of a hybrid approach include:
Flexibility combined with structure: Hybrid methodologies offer the flexibility of Agile combined with the predictability and structure of Waterfall.
To implement a hybrid approach in a web development project, consider the following tips:
Regardless of which one you choose, let’s take a moment to define how you actually implement these strategies.
There might be some specifics about each management style in practice, but today, let’s focus on the general practices applicable to each scenario.
Whether you choose Agile, Waterfall, or a hybrid approach for your web development project, several best practices can help ensure success. Following these guidelines can set your team up for success and deliver high-quality results.
Setting clear goals and expectations ensures everyone’s on the same page and moving in the same direction. It’s also a helpful benchmark for retrospectives and post-mortems to determine what went wrong and what went right.
Setting clear goals and expectations ensures everyone is on the same page and working towards the same objectives.
Even if Agile significantly emphasizes frequent communication, you can still escape those video calls with Waterfall!
Establish proper communication channels so your entire team knows precisely when and how to communicate about project developments.
Regardless of your chosen methodology, regularly monitoring and adapting the process as needed is essential.
Regularly monitoring and adapting the process ensures that your project stays on track and delivers the best possible results.
So, what have we learned today?
So, there’s no “right” or “wrong” approach, as it all depends on your needs, project scope, and what your team is ultimately comfortable working with.
If you’re eager to start the digital transformation of your new business but aren’t sure where to start, don’t hesitate to contact us! Our team will be more than happy to go through all of your requirements to determine what kind of approach will be best for your custom web project (or even if you need a custom web solution at all!)
Agile is a flexible, iterative approach emphasizing collaboration and delivering working software quickly, while Waterfall is a structured, linear approach focusing on extensive planning and documentation.
The choice between Agile and Waterfall depends on various factors, including project complexity, team experience, client involvement, and budget and timeline constraints. Consider your project’s specific needs and goals to determine the best fit.
Yes, hybrid methodologies that combine elements of both Agile and Waterfall are becoming increasingly popular. These approaches offer a balance of flexibility and structure, allowing teams to adapt to the unique needs of their projects.